Leadership Styles Assignment Help on making assessment of current management behavior in Australia

This assignment help on magazine/journal article making a critical assessment of current (contemporary) management behavior in Australia.

Leadership styles

In the highly globalized competitive market there is high need of valuable leader to reduce the internal and external pressure on the employees of the organization. It is necessary to achieve the goals of productivity, sales and other targets of the organisation which can be easily attained with the help of effective leadership style. Leader is the person which is followed due to internal motivation among the followers. There are several leadership styles based on the personality and decision making style of the leaders. In the current scenario it is required that the leader will understand complexities and take decisions in rapid changing environment.

Autocratic leadership: In this leadership the leader acts as the owner of the business, all the decisions and authority is in the hands of the leader. This kind of leader does not listen to the subordinates and employees and the orders are communicated downwards. This work environment will have no flexibility for the employees they have to follow the guidelines and policies implemented (Bhatti, et al., 2012). There are rare situations this kind of leaders are supported or followed enthusiastically.

Democratic leadership: This leadership style is very popular and there are large number of followers for this kind of leadership it is the leadership style which is popular at present time. In this leadership style leader involves employees, subordinates and discuss the issues with each other to take a decision for the benefit of the organisation (Ojokuku, et al., 2012). The communication of the information flows both upward and down ward. It enhances creativity, competency, fairness, honesty and intelligence among the employees which also results to more participation for organization growth.

Transformational leadership: This kind of leader motivates the employees continuously to enhance the capabilities and to achieve higher goals than they can actually able to achieve. It is the process of initiating change in the organization, its employees and others (Antonakis and House, 2013).. This kind of leader succeed in achieving and transforming the whole organization towards a new course of action by setting more challenging targets and setting high performance criteria and achieving them. It empowers the followers to internally motivate towards achieving the goals.

Transactional leadership: This leadership also focuses on motivating the employees with rewards and recognition; it is exchange process where followers are appreciated by awarding them on the achievement of the organizational goals, expectations or targets. The expectations of the organisation are clearly mentioned to the employees with a set of standards and at the same time rewards, motivated them to work so that they can achieve the same.

Charismatic leadership: These are the leaders which are having skills of good communication they are able to encourage the followers in such a manner. Charismatic leaders motivate followers to work enthusiastically by motivating them with their personality (Antonakis and House, 2013). They inculcate the decisions over them, so followers follow them on the commitment and the way they perform actions. Basically employees follow them due to internal motivation. They are the personalities which transforms the followers to achieve the targets looking unachievable.

Laissez-faire Leadership: This kind of leader gives full authority to the followers, there is experienced team under the leader which is self driven so they are allowed to work as per their will and there is no interference of the leader (Buch, et al., 2015). It is not a much popular leadership style and it is also considered as lease satisfying style because human nature is driven with push effect people tends to perform better when some pressure is putted. In the absence of surveillance there are more chances of decrease in productivity.